Kirjoja tulostettavaksi tai ruudulta luettavaksi.
|
|
|
Michael Billig: Banal Nationalism
torstai, 14.03. 2013 @ 21:10
Views 26
|
|
|
|
|
David Graeber. Debt: The first 5,000 years
perjantai, 23.11. 2012 @ 20:15
Views 196
|
|
|
|
|
Communization and its Discontents: Contestation, Critique, and Contemporary Struggles
keskiviikko, 16.11. 2011 @ 19:40
Views 208
|
|
|
|
|
David Graeber: Direct Action: An Ethnography
tiistai, 13.09. 2011 @ 20:30
Views 225
|
|
|
|
|
Tere Vadén: Karhun nimi. Kuusi luentoa luonnosta
maanantai, 12.09. 2011 @ 17:08
Views 224
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Black: Anarchy After Leftism
tiistai, 23.08. 2011 @ 18:51
Views 230
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart Christie: Stefano Delle Chiaie - Portrait of a 'black' terrorist
keskiviikko, 29.06. 2011 @ 03:23
Views 186
|
|
|
|
|
John Zerzan: Twilight of the Machines
tiistai, 31.05. 2011 @ 00:56
Views 147
|
|
|
|
|
Monsieur Dupont - Nihilist Communism: A Critique of Optimism in the Far Left
tiistai, 31.05. 2011 @ 00:56
Views 312
|
|
|
|
|
Anarchism - A Very Short Introduction
maanantai, 30.05. 2011 @ 19:28
Views 570
|
|
|
|
|
John Zerzan: Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization
maanantai, 30.05. 2011 @ 19:28
Views 341
|
|
|
|
|
John Zerzan: Elements of Refusal
maanantai, 30.05. 2011 @ 19:28
Views 179
|
|
!['Nihilist communism' argues against the conception of 'consciousness raising' and recruiting as practised by the far left, whereby it is implicitly assumed that the social revolution may be brought about by enough persons spreading communist ideas effectively enough. Monsieur Dupont also argues regularly against class consciousness and even consciousness as a factor in revolution. To this, they counterpose a model of revolution based on a crisis of capitalism which will necessitate the appropriation of entire key industries by the essential proletariat - a class which they believe should be defined solely by the economic position of its members. They write (in a manner somewhat typical of their style):
'We do not know what anyone means when they describe the proletariat as a social category. If they are implying that the working class as a social body have something between themselves other than their experience of work then we utterly reject this. MD [i.e. Monsieur Dupont] have a penchant for Champagne and Tarkovsky movies whereas our neighbours prefer White Lightening and WWF wrestling, our economic position, however, is identical.'
'The Proletariat will not be motivated by political values in its resistance to work but by its selfish interest to assert its species being; its bodily desire to be human floods across the barriers of separation. There is nothing nice or noble or heroic about the working class, it is essential to the productive process which constitutes the structure of our reality and therefore essential to revolution and the abolition of reality based on production.'](http://takku.net/mediagallery/mediaobjects/tn/0/tn_0_dupont_-_nihilist_communism_-_a_critique_of_optimism_in_the_far_left.jpg "'Nihilist communism' argues against the conception of 'consciousness raising' and recruiting as practised by the far left, whereby it is implicitly assumed that the social revolution may be brought about by enough persons spreading communist ideas effectively enough. Monsieur Dupont also argues regularly against class consciousness and even consciousness as a factor in revolution. To this, they counterpose a model of revolution based on a crisis of capitalism which will necessitate the appropriation of entire key industries by the essential proletariat - a class which they believe should be defined solely by the economic position of its members. They write (in a manner somewhat typical of their style):
'We do not know what anyone means when they describe the proletariat as a social category. If they are implying that the working class as a social body have something between themselves other than their experience of work then we utterly reject this. MD [i.e. Monsieur Dupont] have a penchant for Champagne and Tarkovsky movies whereas our neighbours prefer White Lightening and WWF wrestling, our economic position, however, is identical.'
'The Proletariat will not be motivated by political values in its resistance to work but by its selfish interest to assert its species being; its bodily desire to be human floods across the barriers of separation. There is nothing nice or noble or heroic about the working class, it is essential to the productive process which constitutes the structure of our reality and therefore essential to revolution and the abolition of reality based on production.'")
